Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorValor Martínez, Carmenes-ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-12T16:11:37Z
dc.date.available2025-11-12T16:11:37Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/107169
dc.description.abstractes-ES
dc.description.abstractAnthropomorphized portrayals of nature, particularly Mother Nature, are widely used to foster ecological responsibility but produce inconsistent responses, from care to detachment to blame. Prior research rarely examines why such portrayals diverge in impact. Addressing this gap, we explore the moral meanings audiences construct from Mother Nature personifications and how these shape human–nature relations. Drawing on 21 interviews and 140 Reddit posts, we identify four contrasting yet coexisting portrayals of Mother Nature. Our moral–relational model explains how these meanings drive divergent emotional and behavioral responses, advancing theory on nature anthropomorphism and guiding more effective sustainable communication.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightses_ES
dc.rights.uries_ES
dc.titleMoral Archetypes of Mother Nature: How Anthropomorphism Shapes Human-Nature Relationshipses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperes_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses_ES
dc.keywordses-ES
dc.keywordsen-GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record