Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCamacho Ibáñez, Javieres-ES
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-07T15:22:23Z
dc.date.available2022-06-07T15:22:23Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11531/68500
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this research proposal is to advance in closing the gap between practice and research in the area of AI/MACHINE ETHICS through a mapping of state of the art for Ethics in AI at different levels: macro, mezzo and micro: - "Macro" (regional, national and significant corporation guidelines), which affect the "purpose", type of applications that might be allowed to use (or ban) in public spaces, for example, where privacy and security issues are paramount. - "Meso" (applications/use cases,) Scenarios where there is a clear human-machine interaction: business decision making, recruitment, even autonomous cars, how is that hand-over of moral control between human-machine process managed? Is the person readily prepared for "assuming" control or taking the decision? Is the info for the decision "biased"? Can we expect a better decision? Which ethical aspects/framework have been considered? - "Micro" (algorithmic implementations). Which are the current implementations of ethical framework/theories in machine learning or alternative AI models? Where are the current limits? In terms of methodology, a literature review on the latest developments of AI/machine ethics at the three levels has been carried over.es-ES
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this research proposal is to advance in closing the gap between practice and research in the area of AI/MACHINE ETHICS through a mapping of state of the art for Ethics in AI at different levels: macro, mezzo and micro: - "Macro" (regional, national and significant corporation guidelines), which affect the "purpose", type of applications that might be allowed to use (or ban) in public spaces, for example, where privacy and security issues are paramount. - "Meso" (applications/use cases,) Scenarios where there is a clear human-machine interaction: business decision making, recruitment, even autonomous cars, how is that hand-over of moral control between human-machine process managed? Is the person readily prepared for "assuming" control or taking the decision? Is the info for the decision "biased"? Can we expect a better decision? Which ethical aspects/framework have been considered? - "Micro" (algorithmic implementations). Which are the current implementations of ethical framework/theories in machine learning or alternative AI models? Where are the current limits? In terms of methodology, a literature review on the latest developments of AI/machine ethics at the three levels has been carried over.en-GB
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoen-GBes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada Españaes_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/es_ES
dc.titleMapping AI Ethics: from principles into practicees_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaperes_ES
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftes_ES
dc.rights.holderes_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.keywordsetica, inteligencia artificiales-ES
dc.keywordsethics, artificial intelligenceen-GB


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada España